In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims'' fair compensation.This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Martin Redish, Books, Reference and Language, Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit Books>Reference and Language Much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. This work aims to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory.<
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford Law Books, 01.05.2009, Stanford Law Books, 2009<
Thalia.de
Nr. 16768607. Frais d'envoi, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00) Details...
(*) Livre non disponible signifie que le livre est actuellement pas disponible à l'une des plates-formes associées nous recherche.
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Thalia.de
Nr. 16768607. Frais d'envoi, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00) Details...
(*) Livre non disponible signifie que le livre est actuellement pas disponible à l'une des plates-formes associées nous recherche.
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Orellfuessli.ch
Nr. 16768607. Frais d'envoi, Erscheint in neuer Auflage, zzgl. Versandkosten. (EUR 16.41) Details...
(*) Livre non disponible signifie que le livre est actuellement pas disponible à l'une des plates-formes associées nous recherche.
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims'' fair compensation.This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Martin Redish, Books, Reference and Language, Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit Books>Reference and Language Much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. This work aims to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory.<
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford Law Books, 01.05.2009, Stanford Law Books, 2009<
Nr. 16768607. Frais d'envoi, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00)
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) Martin H. Redish gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Nr. 16768607. Frais d'envoi, Lieferbar in 1 - 2 Wochen, DE. (EUR 0.00)
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a… Plus…
In recent years, much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. Many lawyers and judges have noted the intense pressure to settle caused by the very filing of a suit. Some contend that the procedure amounts to a form of judicial blackmail. Others counter that it is an effective means of policing corporate behavior and assuring injured victims' fair compensation. This book represents the first scholarly effort to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory. Redish argues that the modern class action undermines foundational constitutional principles, including procedural due process and separation of powers, and has been improperly transformed from its origins as a complex procedural device into a means for altering controlling substantive law in highly undemocratic ways. Redish proposes an alternative vision of the class action lawsuit, one that is designed to enable the device to serve its valuable procedural purposes without simultaneously contravening core precepts of American constitutional democracy. Buch (fremdspr.) gebundene Ausgabe, Stanford University Press, 20.04.2009, Stanford University Press, 2009<
Nr. 16768607. Frais d'envoi, Erscheint in neuer Auflage, zzgl. Versandkosten. (EUR 16.41)
1Comme certaines plateformes ne transmettent pas les conditions d'expédition et que celles-ci peuvent dépendre du pays de livraison, du prix d'achat, du poids et de la taille de l'article, d'une éventuelle adhésion de la plateforme, d'une livraison directe par la plateforme ou via un prestataire tiers (Marketplace), etc. il est possible que les frais de livraison indiqués par eurolivre ne correspondent pas à ceux de la plateforme qui propose l'article.
Données bibliographiques du meilleur livre correspondant
Much political and legal debate has centered on the class action lawsuit. This work aims to view the modern class action comprehensively through the lenses of American political and constitutional theory.
Informations détaillées sur le livre - Wholesale Justice: Constitutional Democracy and the Problem of the Class Action Lawsuit
EAN (ISBN-13): 9780804752749 ISBN (ISBN-10): 0804752745 Version reliée Date de parution: 2009 Editeur: STANFORD UNIV PR 317 Pages Poids: 0,544 kg Langue: eng/Englisch
Livre dans la base de données depuis 2012-12-18T04:01:49+01:00 (Zurich) Page de détail modifiée en dernier sur 2020-09-15T18:14:01+02:00 (Zurich) ISBN/EAN: 9780804752749
ISBN - Autres types d'écriture: 0-8047-5274-5, 978-0-8047-5274-9 Autres types d'écriture et termes associés: Titre du livre: the problem democracy
Autres livres qui pourraient ressembler au livre recherché:
